Re: homophones

Subject: Re: homophones
From: HOLLAND -at- IPFWCVAX -dot- BITNET
Date: Thu, 27 Jan 1994 07:49:07 EST

Only in the past year or two have I seen lots of . . .

"This is a critical process. ANOTHER WORDS, doing it properly
is essential."

Steve Hollander
holland -at- cvax -dot- ipfw -dot- indiana -dot- edu


Previous by Author: Re: Trade Mark Notices
Next by Author: M/F terminology tai-kwan-do, ad nauseum
Previous by Thread: Re: homophones
Next by Thread: Re: Re[2]: homophones


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads