TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
> LaVonna Funkhouser said:
>> Persons attracted to computer science are often also those attracted to
>> mathematics, and boys usually outnumber girls in those classes, too.
> Karen (karenk -at- netcom -dot- com) replied:
> I'm reading my mail backwards because I've been out of touch for
> a couple of days, so please forgive me if I'm touching on something
> that's already been discussed. How can boys outnumber girls in math
> classes if math is required through the sophomore year in high
> school? (Because you're talking about junior high here, right? Or
> are other school districts different from the one I grew up in?)
I'd assume the correlation is for elective math classes,
something most high schools have (and when I went through high school,
in the early eighties, *math* was required, but the range of math
classes varied widely - some students took geometry while others took
algebra while still others took calculus, all in the same grade).
> Also, the connection between math and computers is, IMHO, a false
> one. [...she's not a math weenie, yet she feels computers enhanced
> the quality of her life...]
I think the connection is inclusive, not exclusive. Not that
the humanities weenies are less likely, but that math weenies are
*more* likely. Plus, the topic under discussion was (I think it's
strayed a bit) the predominance of males in the computer field (which
means a heavy emphasis on engineering, programming, etc) and it's
probably a valid point.