TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
I saw Winston Churchill misquoted *twice* here today, so I had
to step in. Here is the quote:
"This is the kind of arrant pedantry up with which I will not put."
-- Winston Churchill
----------------------------
For further explanation, I submit the following
from _Engineered Writing, A Manual for Scientific, Technical,
and Business Writers (2nd ed)_ by Melba Jerry Murray and Hugh
Hay-Roe, pages 181-2:
"...a preposition is sometimes the best word to end a sentence with.
The Latin preposition was literally a pre-positioned word; in
accordance with its name and use, it had to come *before* something.
That's how we came by the 'rule' that you can't end a sentence with
a preposition. Nevertheless, modern English includes a long list of
such constructions:
What is that all about?
This is a manufacturer (whom) we can count on.
I don't know what it is for.
That's a deep subject (which) we're getting into.
People who tolerate pedantry are responsible for the kind of
foolishness that once appeared on an office bulletin board. The
company credit union was publicizing money to lend; below a
breezy picture of a hand in which a real penny was taped was
this stiffly 'correct' note:
'--And there's more from where that came!'"