TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: Friendly Fonts From:Rikki Nyman <nymanr -at- TRG -dot- TRGLINK -dot- COM> Date:Thu, 5 May 1994 11:48:25 -0700
Barb:
I will be looking into the Adobe typefaces when I get a chance. In the
meantime, I would see how Friz Quadrata would work (I like the lightness)
or, and this is a departure, but I would experiment with something like
Tekton which is architectural in style and looks hand written. For a short
piece I think it might be kind of fun. Sort of Moosewood cookbookish.
Bye the bye, when I was fussing with fonts last week I found a great book
called "The Electronic Type Catalog" by Steve Byers and published by Bantam
in 1992.
Just my 2 cents.
Rikki
>>In article <9405041125 -dot- tn136211 -at- aol -dot- com>, burkbrick -at- aol -dot- com writes:
>>
>>> I'm working on a document for in-house use that is allowed to be humorous,
>>> and should at least be friendly. Right now, I'm using a boring old Times
>>> Roman typeface, but I'm thinking about going to ITC Souvenir (Corel
>>> Southern). To my eye, it looks friendlier because it's got rounder edges
than
>>> a standard times roman.
>I have two suggestions: New Century Schoolbook was designed for children's
>books -- its nice and round and friendly, not to mention quite readable.
>And it also has the advantage of being available to nearly everyone; all
>print shops and laserwriters generally have it.
>My favourite font family right now is the Adobe Stone series; they are quite
>well designed, very readable, and modern-looking. And the advantage
>of Stone is that all the styles in the family are designed to work together:
>the Serifs go naturally with the San Serifs. Stone Familiar, in particular,
>might be worth looking into.
>Someone else mentioned Palatino; well, I'll shrug and say OK, but in
>my experience Palatino has become "the new Times." Everyone seems to
>be using it for body text nowadays. I think I've written several
>thousand pages in Palatino. :)
>Of course, there's nothing WRONG with a popular font; there's a good
>reason why Times Roman and its ilk have survived this long.
