TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
In writing technical documentation it has been generally taboo to use any
form of gender reference, such as he or she. Alternatives I have seen have
ranged from using the third person plural to the new form; (s)he.
I would appreciate any feed back from colleagues who use these, or
alternatives to these. I am reviewing our style manual, and am not happy with
simply stating that gender reference should not be used. I would like to be
able to provide examples/alternatives. Thanks in advance for your time.
-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=
As much as possible I avoid gender references in my technical
writing -- mostly because it has no relevance to content. In
those rare circumstances when it is necessary to use a
singular personal pronoun, I default to the generic male
"he", "his". I find that using variations of he/she, (s)he,
he (or she) to be distracting and burdensome to the reader.
It also comes off as being silly or offensively patronizing
(depending on your POV) when the audience is almost
exclusively male. [Naturally my "default" would be different
for a gender ratio tilted in the other direction.]
A common mistake that I notice is the use of "they", "their"
in a singular sense, which I believe is a lazy way of
complying with style manuals which prohibit, rather than
discourage gender reference.
BTW, I was flogged for this opinion in the copyedit-l mail
list, which is geared more to general writing.