Re: PostScript Document Distribution (Was Adobe Acrobat)

Subject: Re: PostScript Document Distribution (Was Adobe Acrobat)
From: Vicki Rosenzweig <murphy!acmcr!vr -at- UUNET -dot- UU -dot- NET>
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 1994 16:11:35 EDT

If you're really concerned with version control, hardcopy might
be the way to go--few people will want to take the trouble to
re-enter it, and other changes will show. And many of us find
it harder to read long documents on screen than on paper, so if
the documentation doesn't take advantage of being online (with
things like animation), printing it out is to the user's benefit.

Vicki Rosenzweig
vr%acmcr -dot- uucp -at- murphy -dot- com
New York, NY


Previous by Author: possessives, more or less
Next by Author: Re: What moves on screen?
Previous by Thread: Re: PostScript Document Distribution (Was Adobe Acrobat)
Next by Thread: Re: PostScript Document Distribution (Was Adobe Acrobat)


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads