TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: Standard Problems From:Andreas Ramos <andreas -at- NETCOM -dot- COM> Date:Fri, 24 Jun 1994 14:50:50 -0700
Dear Ray,
You'll love Brazil's electricity standard:
both 110 and 200.
both AC and DC
and all five types of electric plugs: two flat parallel, two
angled flat, two thin round and one large round, three round, two round.
Did I get them all?
yrs,
andreas
_____________________________________________________________________________
Andreas Ramos, M.A. Heidelberg Sacramento, California
On Fri, 24 Jun 1994, Ray Bruman x2325 wrote:
> "David L. Bergart" <bodafu -at- CCVAX -dot- SINICA -dot- EDU -dot- TW> writes:
> >
> > Before temperature scales were weeded down to the two we use today,
> > there were all sorts of creative scales. My favorite used the temperature of
> > the dirt in the basement of a house in Paris (why am I not surprised?) as th
> > low temperature reference, and the rectal temperature of a cow (an ISO cow?)
> > in a field at noon on a sunny summer day as the high temperature reference.
> > Now *that* is what I call a standard.
> >
> Yay!! This is wonderful! It's time to announce my book project, called
> "Standard Problems."
> It seems to me that whenever human beings encounter an opportunity to
> standardize an otherwise arbitrary choice, they screw it up. Examples:
> If you think A4 versus "US letter" is fun, why not propose that your
> enterprise save paper and insist that all pages be only 8.0 by 10.5
> inches? Of course, you'll need new 3-ring binders, manila folders
> and so on, but your suppliers will be happy to warehouse both kinds of
> every paper-related merchandise. Won't they? You bet they will, if you
> are the United States Department of Defense! They only recently gave
> up on this amazing military specification.
> The human urge to screw up standards is more powerful than the urge
> to save lives or billions of dollars. Driving on the left No!! No!!
> It's Driving on the Right!! that causes people to step off the curb
> and be killed because they are looking to the right No!! that's WRONG!
> when they travel. American car manufacturers still seem mystified at
> the poor sales in Japan, though they never switched the steering wheels.
> If the Japanese manufacturers were that dumb, none of us would be in
> Accord. (Sorry about that.)
> Airplanes have run out of fuel, killing all aboard, because of confusion
> over gallons versus liters when they refueled.
> The United States is NOT the only country in the world stubbornly
> sticking to the "English" system of weights and measures. There is
> also the Sultanate of Brunei. And in Italy, household plumbing
> pipe uses American inch standards.
> Every country in the world has a standard for electrical plugs and
> receptacles. In fact there are 137 different national standards.
> When telegraphy was young, it made sense to put a slash through a zero
> to distinguish it from the letter "O" because there weren't many
> zeroes to transmit. When computers were new, they almost never had
> alphabetical characters to deal with, so they decided to slash the
> letter "O." Then came telecommunications.
> OK, Technical Writers! Send me your stories! I will give you
> editorial credit and attribution. Use E-mail rather than annoying
> the readers of TECHWR-L who aren't interested in Standard Problems.
> Ray Bruman Cogito, ergo remuneror.
> Raynet Corp.
> rbruman -at- raynet -dot- com I think, therefore I am paid.
> 415-688-2325