TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Prior to - before - earlier From:Mark Levinson <mark -at- SD -dot- CO -dot- IL> Date:Tue, 23 Aug 1994 10:07:52 IDT
It's mostly not used this way--I've get sentences and tables with
things like "this is the way things work in versions prior to 3.0, and
this is the way things work in later verions".
** You can have a "prior version" but you can't have a "before version."
Maybe that's why people prefer "prior"... it applies a bit more
clearly to the version itself. If you say "this is the way
things work in versions before 3.0" then the reader has to figure
out that you mean "versions before" rather than "work before".
Personally, I usually refer to "earlier" versions.
_________________________________________________________________________
Mark L. Levinson | E-mail: mark -at- sd -dot- co -dot- il
Summit EDA Technologies | Voice: +972-9-507102, ext. 230 (work),
Box 544 | +972-9-552411 (home)
46105 Herzlia, ISRAEL | Fax: +972-9-509118
_________________________________________________________________________
"Graphics are especially useful for drawing readers into the book."
- STC Intercom
_________________________________________________________________________