TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
As George Hayhoe and others have suggested, we are awaiting Corel/Ventura
5.0 to see if our prayers are answered -- my voucher is in the mail.
We plan to use Word 6.0 for word processing and use a publishing program
(hopefully the new Corel/Ventura) for producing manuals. I have found Word
to be a top notch product, BUT -- it is not the answer for lengthy and
complex technical documents.
We still have a bevy of Ventura 3.0 DOS/GEM documents. Why? Because we
were not enamoured with Ventura's first attempts at producing a Windows-based
product. So -- Can we leapfrog from Ventura 3.0 documents to
Corel/Ventura 5.0? Are the .txt, .chp, .sty files portable? I understand
that the .wid and .cif files are going away. Do these files contain any
information that I need to keep or can I just wish them good riddance?
We also have produced manuals using Word 6.0 (despite it's difficulties).
I have invested a lot of work in formatting, indexing, and cross
referencing, in Word. How much of this effort is retained by the
Word-->Ventura filters?
I realize that Corel/Ventura isn't out yet, but does anyone have some
advance knowledge of this release? What might we expect based on
Corel/Ventura 4.2 performance?
I think a few people have been down a similar road, and perhaps others are
getting ready to follow.
Thanks in advance. I'm looking forward to trying Corel/Ventura 5.0,
but we have to make some plans before actually getting our hands on it.
Yes, decisions based on less than complete knowledge - reality rears its
ugly head again.
Respond to the group I suppose, or me if you prefer at: bob -at- brs -dot- com