Re: Re[4]: How one fellow sees us

Subject: Re: Re[4]: How one fellow sees us
From: Karen Kay <karenk -at- NETCOM -dot- COM>
Date: Tue, 11 Oct 1994 09:58:24 -0700

asdxvlk -at- okway -dot- okstate -dot- edu said:
> I don't agree with your criticism of Richard's post.

It wasn't meant as harsh criticism, just a comment or caution. I was
very tempted to do the same thing he did. I didn't, because of
copyright restrictions.

The reason that I was so tempted to post this is that I couldn't
figure out whether wnash's post was a benison or a slam. He certainly did
provide the address to sign up, and so on.

> I think that when
> wnash -at- sunquest -dot- com wrote a diatribe against the Techwriter's list that he
> gave up any rights that he may have had to not have his message
reproduced
> to the very same list that he railed against.

Your civil rights are *not* abrogated if you say something someone
doesn't like.

> It seems that there is a point of law that says everyone has a right to
> "face their accuser" or in this case to at least know what they're being
> accused of.

If you complained to a friend about your boss and she went and told
your boss what you said would you feel the same way? Besides, he *did*
tell us almost exactly the same thing in a post to the list.

Karen
karenk -at- netcom -dot- com


Previous by Author: Re: Re[2]: How one fellow sees us
Next by Author: Re: Re[4]: How one fellow sees us
Previous by Thread: Re: Re[4]: How one fellow sees us
Next by Thread: Re: Re[4]: How one fellow sees us


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads