TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: Re[4]: How one fellow sees us From:Karen Kay <karenk -at- NETCOM -dot- COM> Date:Tue, 11 Oct 1994 09:58:24 -0700
asdxvlk -at- okway -dot- okstate -dot- edu said:
> I don't agree with your criticism of Richard's post.
It wasn't meant as harsh criticism, just a comment or caution. I was
very tempted to do the same thing he did. I didn't, because of
copyright restrictions.
The reason that I was so tempted to post this is that I couldn't
figure out whether wnash's post was a benison or a slam. He certainly did
provide the address to sign up, and so on.
> I think that when
> wnash -at- sunquest -dot- com wrote a diatribe against the Techwriter's list that he
> gave up any rights that he may have had to not have his message
reproduced
> to the very same list that he railed against.
Your civil rights are *not* abrogated if you say something someone
doesn't like.
> It seems that there is a point of law that says everyone has a right to
> "face their accuser" or in this case to at least know what they're being
> accused of.
If you complained to a friend about your boss and she went and told
your boss what you said would you feel the same way? Besides, he *did*
tell us almost exactly the same thing in a post to the list.