TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: WP vs Word From:Marc Santacroce <santa -at- MAILHUB -dot- TFS -dot- COM> Date:Tue, 18 Oct 1994 10:05:31 -0700
My experience is that they assume we can write, and the tool is the tie
breaker.
On Sun, 16 Oct 1994 RJLIPPINCOTT -at- delphi -dot- com wrote:
> Marc Santacroce wrote (regarding WP, Word, and hammers):
> >But the foreman didn't have to to buy 10 copies of a $600 application. I
> >think the client has a right to expect you to conform to them...
> But this reflects on a discussion we had a couple of weeks ago. As the
> client doesn't want to buy 10 different applications, neither do I. I don't
> have the cash, I don't have the hard drive space to own copies of every WP
> and DTP commonly used. But, when I was job hunting, there were these
> barriers. "You know FrameMaker, but not Pagemaker?" "You know Frame on
> Windows, but not on a Mac?" "You know Word for Windows 2.0, but not 6.0?"
> I wish more people had asked me if I knew how to -write-.
> Rick Lippincott
> rjlippincott -at- delphi -dot- com
