TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: Hello from Oz From:Michael LaTorra <mikel -at- HUEY -dot- ACCUGRAPH -dot- COM> Date:Tue, 8 Nov 1994 14:31:44 MST
Margaret Penman wrote (in part):
I propose that good communicators have (amongst other things):
* the ability to recognise the patterns within a system and the
relationships between its components (analysis),
* the ability to view a system/idea from several perspectives
(imagination, mental flexibility, empathy.)
. . . . .
And if so, what do we (communicators) have in common with mathematicians and
musicians? I propose we all have highly developed analytical skills BUT that
in addition:
* communicators have superb empathy,
* mathematicians have incredible processing powers/memories (200MG),
* musicians are in touch with their souls (subconscious/right-brain
call it what you will) and probably a whole lot more.
..........................................................................
Yes, I think that most of what you've said is very probably true. But
I wonder why some people become writers instead of mathematicians or
musicians. Is the choice of one or the other forced on us by our environment,
our heredity, or is it a free will decision?
While I like music and esteem mathematics, I must confess
that I'm not very good at either one. However, my verbal ability is
my strength, so that's what I've followed. When I was younger I wanted
to be a scientist (and still read avidly in that area), but as I went
through school, it soon became obvious that I was beating my head against
a wall in higher mathematics, while I breezed through writing, grammar,
foreign languages, and the like. So even though I would have liked to
pursue a career in science, I knew that I could not go very far in it
without very strong mathematical skills. Therefore, I chose to become
a technical writer. But was this really a choice, or simply the best
available viable option?
Has anyone else on this list had a similar kind of experience?
Live long & prosper,
Mike LaTorra
Documentation Supervisor
Accugraph Inc.
mikel -at- accugraph -dot- com
.....................................................................
The opinions expressed are my own, ][ "Politics is the business of
and not necessarily those of my ][ getting power and privilege
company -- but they probably ][ without possessing merit."
should be. ][ -- P.J. O'Rourke
....................................................................