TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re[2]: spoken & written usage From:"Virginia L. Krenn" <asdxvlk -at- OKWAY -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU> Date:Fri, 11 Nov 1994 15:38:06 -0600
The following message is in MIME format, which your mail reader
may not fully understand. Parts of the message will appear as
text. To process the remainder, you may need special software
to decode Base64, Quoted Printable, or UUENCODE message parts.
If your installation provides a MIME compatible Internet gateway,
you may find that the items associated with this message have been
converted to attachments of the base message. Contact your Email
administrator if you require further assistance.
--IMA.Boundary.784589989
Content-Type: text/plain;
name="RFC822 mail headers"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Description: cc:Mail note part
Received: from osuunx.ucc.okstate.edu by Okway.okstate.edu with SMTP
(IMA Internet Exchange v1.10) id ec3e0940; Fri, 11 Nov 94 15:22:29 -0600
Received: from UTKVX1.UTK.EDU by osuunx.ucc.okstate.edu id aa07576;
11 Nov 94 16:19 CDT
Received: from utkvx.utk.edu by utkvx.utk.edu (PMDF V4.3-10 #6815)
id <01HJCXYU27EU8ZDXA8 -at- utkvx -dot- utk -dot- edu>; Fri, 11 Nov 1994 16:15:58 -0500 (EST)
Date: Fri, 11 Nov 1994 16:15:58 -0500 (EST)
From: MKEENE -at- UTKVX -dot- UTCC -dot- UTK -dot- EDU
Subject: Re: spoken & written usage
In-reply-to: <01HJCV8V3QZ68ZDVU3 -at- utkvx -dot- utk -dot- edu>
Sender: MKEENE -at- utkvx -dot- utk -dot- edu
Resent-to: asdxvlk -at- okway -dot- okstate -dot- edu
To: "Virginia L. Krenn" <asdxvlk -at- okway -dot- okstate -dot- edu>
Resent-cc: TECHWR-L%OSUVM1 -dot- BITNET -at- utkvm1 -dot- utk -dot- edu
Cc: Multiple recipients of list TECHWR-L <TECHWR-L%OSUVM1 -dot- BITNET -at- utkvm1 -dot- utk -dot- edu>
Reply-to: MKEENE -at- utkvx -dot- utk -dot- edu
Message-id: <Pine -dot- 3 -dot- 89 -dot- 9411111648 -dot- A543165632-0100000 -at- utkvx -dot- utk -dot- edu>
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Yes, I'm sure that that is what our professor and textbooks said.
There were also films and visits to the campus Child Development
Laboratories.
No, I can't be sure that they were right.
______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Author: MKEENE -at- UTKVX -dot- UTCC -dot- UTK -dot- EDU at SMTP
This sounds like an early (and wrong) version of the "critical age
hypothesis for language acquisition"--are you sure you got it right? I
used to read and write about this, and I don't remember _anyone_ taking
that strong a stand. That is, in most cultures this "helper speech" (aka
babytalk) phenomenon occurs, and however "set" our language ability is by
the time people stop doing it around us, we seem to recover pretty well.
What you've got here is the strongest imaginable version of a
hypothesis which even in its weak versions is at least questionable.
Maybe someone else out there knows the right of this?