TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: spoken & written usage From:Ronald Lee Stone <ston0030 -at- GOLD -dot- TC -dot- UMN -dot- EDU> Date:Sat, 12 Nov 1994 15:23:28 -0500
TECHWR-L folk,
The example 'that/who' sentences might have been
intended for a description of a class assignment,
probably to be read aloud to a class.
Anyway, even someone like me, who is grammatically
flexible (except where clarity/meaning are at issue)
can stop at certain usages. It was difficult to reveal
this to the list, but I don't doubt that others have
similar experiences.
In regard to being a graduate student, I do not
believe that academia holds a monopoly on theory,
nor that industry holds a monopoly on practice.
I remain, however, interested in the relations
between theory and practice.
--- begin included text ---
Date: Fri, 11 Nov 1994 10:17:00 EST
From: "USA::SOM24502" <SOM24502%USA -dot- decnet -at- USAV01 -dot- GLAXO -dot- COM>
Subject: the who, the that, the forest, the trees
Hey, Y'all,
I laughed when Ronald L. Stone, graduate student
in the Department of Rhetoric at Univ. of Minn.,
wrote:
<For example, I will change
< The student _that_ writes the best essay gets
< published in the anthology.
<to
< The student _who_ writes the best essay gets
< published in the anthology.
It's the essay that gets published, not the
student! The "who" versus "that" controversy
is insignificant compared to this lapse in
logic. Think first, proofread second.
Sue McCullough
Sr Tech Writer
Glaxo Inc. RTP, NC
som24502 -at- Glaxo -dot- com
--- end included text ---
Until later,
Ron
Ronald L. Stone : ston0030 -at- gold -dot- tc -dot- umn -dot- edu : (612) 644-9706
graduate student : Scientific & Technical Communication
Department of Rhetoric : University of Minnesota, St. Paul