TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: Hey, take it easy! From:Vicki Rosenzweig <murphy!acmcr!vr -at- UUNET -dot- UU -dot- NET> Date:Thu, 17 Nov 1994 14:22:14 EST
I think "chair" is one that can be used for either an office that
hasn't been filled (or that has been filled by someone of an
unspecified sex) or for a person, of either sex, doing the job:
I have no problem with "Jane Smith chaired the meeting" or "Bill
Jones is the chair of the committee" (although I also have no
problem with chairman or chairwoman for a person of known sex).
I'd tend to avoid "-person" as an ending when we know what sex we're
dealing with (in part because it winds up being used, almost
euphemistically, for women only: I've seen "spokesman" and
"spokesperson" used as matched labels for men and women, thus
(a) suggesting that "woman" is a dirty word, and (b) once again
leaving us without a non-gendered term).
I don't find singular "they" particularly awkward, but this is (I
think) a matter of individual ear, probably affected by, among
other things, age, geography, politics, and quite possibly barometric
pressure.
My only comment on "womyn" is that it's a convenient marker of the
politics of the user.
Vicki Rosenzweig
vr%acmcr -dot- uucp -at- murphy -dot- com
New York, NY