TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: What software are you using? From:Romay Jean Sitze <rositze -at- NMSU -dot- EDU> Date:Mon, 21 Nov 1994 16:54:14 -0700
On Mon, 21 Nov 1994, KnoxML1 wrote:
> I do scientific & technical editing, substantive editing and some
> writing on technical subjects, and also nontechnical stuff like resumes and
> newsletters. I have done some computer documentation, but not much.
> With those goals in mind, would I be smarter to get Pagemaker, Framemaker, or
> something else? Is any one package used significantly more in the field than
> the others?
I've worked extensively with both Pagemaker and FrameMaker. IMHO,
Pagemaker is more versatile and easier to use than FrameMaker, especially
for things like newsletters. However, if you will be working extensively
with longer documents--manuals, for instance--you might be better off with
FrameMaker because it handles them more efficiently. I suspect that
FrameMaker probably has the edge in technical documentation for that
reason.