TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: Is passive voice ever OK? From:Jan Boomsliter <boom -at- CADENCE -dot- COM> Date:Wed, 30 Nov 1994 12:48:02 -0800
I suggest that you not let it leak. Why say this in a tech doc? And
if you must, do make it active; tell WHO considers .... Otherwise,
isn't it useless?
Jan Boomsliter
===================================
In response to the discussion on use of passive voice, I would add one other
situation -- occasionally, use of passive voice is the best way to avoid an
imperious use of "we" that can often be offputting to the reader. This comes up
particularly when a subjective judgment is in question.
Example: We consider XYZ software to be the leading bean-counting
product on the market today.
Better: XYZ software is considered to be the leading bean-counting
product on the market today.
This kind of language frequently appears in new product announcements, book
introductions, etc. At my company, it sometimes leaks over into the actual
procedures, and this is the fix I use.
