TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Advertising on the list (Was: Stefan Olson) From:Steve English <ink -at- MICROS -dot- COM> Date:Tue, 21 Feb 1995 16:23:37 -0500
Doug Bailey wrote,
> Does anyone else have any opinions? Should people like this be removed
> from the list?
I don't think he should be removed. We all can delete/ignore his posts if
we
like. He may be breaking some minor rules by advertising,
Doug,
I am also a member of a list for Framemaker. Recently, a "gentleman" posted
an advertisement for incense to our list. We were incensed. The way we
decided to respond to this (and future) j-mail was for each of us to send
the offender 3 or 4 responses. Each response was to have a different subject
header (so he couldn't simply delete similar titles-- had to open and read
each one to make sure it wasn't an order), and each was to include noise:
anything from "Please don't do this any more" to "You're a @#$%!" to "Here's
a long press release from my company, hope you enjoy it".
Since there are over 700 people on the framers list, this guy got over
2,000 pieces of j-mail himself. His mailbox overflowed.
For someone with true internet access, this type of response is simply a
major nuisance: one has to scan through all kinds of noise to find genuine
reponses to one's advertisement. Done properly, this can burn up hours.
In this case, however, the guy had a Prodigy or aol address (I forget which),
meaning he PAID for the privilege of receiving each snowflake in the
avalanche. We haven't heard from him since.
I don't agree that advertising in a discussion group is breaking a minor rule.
If we stomp on this sort of thing now, maybe it won't grow into the nuisance
that telephone solicitation and fourth-class postage have become.