TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: Gauging Competency in Technical Writers From:Toni Rizzo <Toni -dot- Rizzo -at- M -dot- CC -dot- UTAH -dot- EDU> Date:Sat, 4 Mar 1995 23:10:55 -0700
Mike,
Although the American Medical Writers Association has discussed the issue
of testing, they don't offer a test at this time. AMWA does offer courses
one can complete to earn a Core Curriculum Certificate and an Advanced
Curriculum Certificate. The courses are excellent and require a fair
amount of work, but don't require passing tests. Now, the Council of
Biology Editors has a test for editors in the Life sciences. If you pass,
you can add the initials ELS after your name. I guess STC is discussing
the issue of testing, but it seems to me it would be pretty hard to test
writing ability in such a diverse group of people. I like AMWA's
approach, myself.
Toni
toni -dot- rizzo -at- m -dot- cc -dot- utah -dot- edu
On Sat, 4 Mar 1995, Robert Plamondon wrote:
> Mike Uhl writes:
> >I repeat what I said before: STC, or some other credible
> >organization, should administer voluntary, standardized
> >testing for the various areas of technical writing
> >skills. The American Medical Writers Assocation offers
> >such courses and exams. This approach would give
> >companies reassurance without the liability.
> What would these tests reveal? All I use testing for is to reveal
> whether or not you are familiar with certain basic concepts I
> require in a writer with prior experience. In a standardized test,
> there would instantly be a study guide that clued people into the
> right answers, while leaving them unfamiliar with the concepts.