TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: Early bird From:lori m long <llong -at- UNM -dot- EDU> Date:Fri, 10 Mar 1995 22:39:39 -0700
On Fri, 10 Mar 1995, Beverly Parks wrote:
> Just to add another viewpoint on this...
> In federal civil service, the hiring official has the option of
> interviewing all qualified applicants or interviewing no one. If
> 20 applicants were referred, the hiring official cannot
> interview until he/she finds the right person and then stop. All
> 20 must be interviewed. The hiring official does, however, have
> the option of conducting no interviews and making a selection
> based on job application, resume, and references.
> This may be based on equal employment opportunity guidelines,
> but I'm not sure.
> (This information is based on previous experience; regulations
> change. If this one has, then I may be wrong!)
As far as I know, it is based on EEO and Affirmative Action (AA) both.
In addition, they are required to keep a log of incoming applications
that includes race, whether or not the individual was interviewed, and
whether or not the individual was hired. The only inaccuracy I see in
your statement is that "All 20 must be interviewed." Only QUALIFIED
applicants must be interviewed -- many gov. agencies determine this when
resumes are screened in HR (they are given a list of requirements and
scan the resumes for "buzz" words).
In my experience, the most qualified candidate gets the job whether I
interviewed them first, last, or in the middle. I take copious notes
during interviews and go to the second interview if the choice is
unclear. If I find a candidate I like, I do not stop interview just in
case there is someone that is even better out there (the eternal
optimist . . . )