TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re[2]: Re. Quark vs. PageMaker From:"Virginia L. Krenn" <asdxvlk -at- OKWAY -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU> Date:Thu, 4 May 1995 15:29:37 -0500
Maybe I'm misunderstanding what you're trying to say. But, if not,
then Pagemaker automatically makes these adjustments when you make a
change to the text.
Virginia Krenn
asdxvlk -at- okway -dot- okstate -dot- edu
______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: Re: Re. Quark vs. PageMaker
Author: James Mathewson <math0038 -at- gold -dot- tc -dot- umn -dot- edu> at SMTP
Date: 5/3/95 4:32 PM
I've worked with both and I have to say Quark blows PageMaker out of the
water. For example, suppose you want to line up your document on the top
and bottom of the page in a three-column format. In PageMaker , every time
you make a change to the document, you have to go back and fix all your
columns. Not with Quark. It does it automatically. This is just one of
many headaches I no longer have since switching to Quark.
