TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
> >QuarkXpress is really very much an advertising designer's or colour
> >publisher's tool. All my graphic deisgner friends use & love it - its great
> >for colour seps, etc - but then they don't notice the lack of automatic
> >TOCs, indexing, etc (and as one of them said, 'it's great for less than
> >three pages'). If you were using Ventura, and thinking of Framemaker, Quark
> >is probably not for you. It's certainly not something I'd think of for
> >technical publication.
> Quark is THE program in magazine and book publishing. The vast majority of
> magazines you see on newsstands, and books you see in bookstores, are done
> using Quark (Time, Newsweek, People, Details, USA Today, the list is
> endless). It is superb for long documents.
> TOC and Indexing does not come standard with Quark, but there are several
> extensions that do these functions.
> I've taught people to use Quark and to use PageMaker. Quark is much easier to
> learn than PageMaker. It works more logically and allows for more precise
> alignment and text adjustment.
> --Yvette
I couldn't have said it (and did not say it) better myself.
