Re[2]: Robo-Help

[Thomas Burgin <Thomas -dot- Burgin -at- MAILPORT -dot- DELTA-AIR -dot- COM>]

Message authorized by:
    : Stephaniex_goble -at- CCM -dot- CH -dot- INTEL -dot- COM_at_smtp at MAILPORT


Stephanie,

Were you using RoboHelp 3.0?

Thomas
______________________________ Reply Separator
_________________________________
Subject: Re: Robo-Help
Author:  TECHWR-L -at- VM1 -dot- ucc -dot- okstate -dot- edu_at_smtp at MAILPORT
Date:    5/1/95 3:23 PM


Comments:     Warning -- original Sender: tag was news -at- BUBBA -dot- UCC -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU

Comments: To: techwr-l -at- vm1 -dot- ucc -dot- okstate -dot- edu

Tracie Speer <traspeer -at- rs6000 -dot- cmp -dot- ilstu -dot- edu> wrote:

> I'm wondering if anyone has used the Robo-Help program and could provide
me
> any information about it.  I'm interested in determining when you would
use
> the program, how difficult it is to learn and how predictable is the
> program.

> Thank you for your input.

> Tracie

Tracie -
  I have used it lightly: it is useful for small-scale projects where
you are creating all-new documents.  It FORCES you to write its way,
which drove me nuts.  It has a hard time with long help files.

  Doc-to-Help is better if you are converting existing material, and
handles large help files better than RoboHelp.

Stephanie