TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: THE MOST UNKINDEST CUT From:James Mathewson <math0038 -at- GOLD -dot- TC -dot- UMN -dot- EDU> Date:Fri, 12 May 1995 11:01:26 -0500
Being the editor of a magazine, I sympathize with the outrage over
editing standards. But I know from first-hand experience how easy it is
for errors to slip through. I get six or seven good sets of eyes to look
at the dummies before the disks are sent out. Yet, I invariably find
problems on the blue lines. I don't know if the data get corrupted at
prepress or what, but I could swear I send out perfect stuff and it
comes back with imperfections. Once they run the blue lines, it costs a
lot of money to make changes. At this stage, it is a matter of budget
concerns whether you make a particular change or not. Also, it takes
time (on the printer's end) to make these changes. If a magazine is going
to miss deadlines because of a few typos, it will lose advertising
revenue. So most editors accept a few mistakes. But if they're like me,
each one is as painful as passing a kidney stone.
