TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
My two cents on the thread that tech writers have to undo 12+ years of poor=
=20
English instruction...
In my experience grading thousands of engineering co-op reports (it's a=20
living, though not a pleasant one), I've also found a general tendency=20
for excessive formality of language. This is manifest in passive voice, an=
=20
inability to use anything other than third person, lots of modal verbs,=20
etc...
Many engineers consider themselves scientists. Scientific language is=20
overtly formal. This attitude has sneaked into the workplace and become=20
part of engineering culture. In order to be an active participant in this=
=20
culture, engineers must learn to write formally. Managers send reports=20
back that are too colloquial. Young engineers quickly learn to write=20
formally since they are evaluated on the basis of their reports.=20
The audience of engineering reports consists in other=20
engineers. These engineers expect formal language. One's credibility as=20
an engineer depends on language formality. Fort these reasons, in this=20
context, it is perfectly appropriate to write this way.
Engineers run into problems problems when they try to write this way for=20
other audiences (marketers, users, etc.). Some can make the transition=20
from engineer speak to these other audiences,=20
most cannot (or their time is too valuable to translate their documents). =
=20
Hence the need for technical writers =D1 people who have been=20
trained to find out who the audience is and how to best write for them.=20
I don't think it is a matter of poor English instruction that plagues=20
engineers. Their writing tends to be very good in the appropriate=20
context. But given the culture of engineering and its linguistic=20
formality, they become too narrow in their conception of good writing. =20
This is more an occupational hazard than the result of poor schooling.