TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Concidences in Webster's 3rd From:Scott Goodhue <goodhue -at- SMTPGATE -dot- DISCLOSURE -dot- COM> Date:Tue, 6 Jun 1995 16:45:34 EST
Golly, all this fracas over incidents/incidences...Webster's 3rd
Edition is considered America's OED, #1 in 'Merican academics. Well
here's the proof from the pudding:
Look at page 1142 for the definition of incidence. There you will
find incidence/[pronunciation]/N [in italics] -s.
That "-s" at the end indicates that to make incidence plural, ad an
"s".
How do I know that -s is what I say it is? Refer to the explanation
15A under inflectional forms, section 4.4 and 4.5:
"...a noun that has only a regular English plural formed by adding the
suffix -s or the suffix -es or by changing the final -y to -i- and
adding the suffix -es is indicated by an -s or -es following the label
N [italics]...[examples] bird...N -s, love...N -s...."
"...all standard English nouns can have regular English plurals...such
endings are give analogically in this dictionary to nouns that may
little be used in the plural...All that there presence means in cases
of doubtful frequency is that these plurals are available for use if
needed..."
You'll find that most nouns in the English language are made plural by
adding an -s or -es. Naturally, there are exceptions such as those
that end in "f," "ff," or "fe."
Oh, by the way, "remember his past negligences" is used in the
definition of negligence!
