TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: figures/illustrations From:Kelly Hoffman <kelly -at- NASHUA -dot- HP -dot- COM> Date:Wed, 7 Jun 1995 13:11:55 -0400
Kevin Sporleder <kevinsp -at- crt -dot- com> wrote:
> > Our group has been wondering if it is most common to number all
> > graphics or to number just the important ones.
Stephen P. Victor <svictor -at- lgc -dot- com> responded:
> Do you provide a list of figures for users to refer to? If not,
> there's no reason to number figures at all.
Wellll, not necessarily. It's perfectly reasonable to refer to
"figure 5 on the previous page" or whatever, even if you don't provide
a list of figures.
As for whether you should number only the "important" graphics, why
are you including graphics that are not "important"?
Regards,
kkh
--
Kelly K. Hoffman Hewlett-Packard, Network Test Division, Nashua, NH
kelly -at- nashua -dot- hp -dot- com "Reading the manual is admitting defeat."
