Re: In Defense of Salary History

Subject: Re: In Defense of Salary History
From: "Less is more." <yvonne -at- SMARTSTAR -dot- COM>
Date: Mon, 12 Jun 1995 10:05:24 -0700

Chris Willis <ChrisOp -at- aol -dot- com> writes:

> It's frustrating to spend time interviewing someone, thinking
> they might be a fine addition to the team, only to find out that their
> expectations don't match their skill in this area.
<snip>
> ... it's fairly obvious that someone who is used to making $50
> K per year in a related field is not going to be happy for long at $30 K per
> year in an entry level position. I'm willing to work with these people if
> they will work with me. However, if someone's not willing to bet that they
> can come up to speed and make themselves worth a higher wage in the long run,
> why should I? It's a waste of each of our time to even proceed with an
> interview.

> Therein lies the value of the salary history.

No, therein lies the value of stating the salary range you are offering in
your position announcements and describing the job requirements clearly.

Yvonne DeGraw
Sr. Technical Writer, etc.
yvonne -at- smartstar -dot- com


Previous by Author: Re: One Action Per Step
Next by Author: Re: What to call us
Previous by Thread: Re: In Defense of Salary History
Next by Thread: Re: In Defense of Salary History


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads