Using "things" in prose

Subject: Using "things" in prose
From: "Dave L. Meek's User Account" <dave -at- ROGUE -dot- DISC-SYNERGY -dot- COM>
Date: Fri, 16 Jun 1995 09:56:25 -0700

Barbara Hallnan wrote:

We all love getting our sacred prose edited.
I'm currently being edited, and my editor changed:

> You are ready to move mail messages if you have:
> - Created ....
> - Moved ...

> to

> When you have done the following things, you are ready to move
> mail messages:
> - Created ...
> - Moved ...


> I have a THING against using THINGS in my prose.

> What's your opinion?

First of all, your original version reads MUCH better; the
"edited" version is long and clumsy. IMHO, "things" in this
context sounds bland, which doesn't help matters.

Good luck!


""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""
Dave Meek


Previous by Author: Re: Re. Salary history
Next by Author: A grammar-gender question
Previous by Thread: Re: Using "things" in prose
Next by Thread: Re: Using "things" in prose


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads