TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:NON-DELIVERY of: Re: Humor, Dr. Suess From:Lotus -dot- M -dot- a -dot- i -dot- l -dot- Exchange -at- TESSPO-VA -dot- SMTRW -dot- LANGATE -dot- SPRINT -dot- COM Date:Fri, 23 Jun 1995 07:47:00 -0400
Your document:
Re: Humor, Dr. Suess
could not be delivered to:
Ronni Perry -at- CRWMS at DL-Notes -at- DL_CCMAIL
because:
MailEx0010: cc:Mail user name too long.
Routing path:
DLLN2,DLLN2,DLLN2,DLLN2
> The initial, mean, pedantic reply to the new list member's posting at
> once managed to stop the spurious transmission of redundant pieces, and
> to stifle that member's input on any future issue.
> Who knows what contributions we'll miss? We don't, and never will.
> That's an awfully high price to pay, and I regret that we all have to pay it.
Oh, come on! Don't we all have enough to do already without having to
sift through redundant postings?
While Arlen could have used more tact, the content of his post was right
on. People should limit their posts to thoughtful, original
(possibly humorous) comments or legitimate technical writing concerns.
While I would like the list to be more welcoming to newbies, the best way
to teach them netequette is to tell them when they go wrong.
And lose the forelorn attitude. If we sit and wonder what might have
happened if only we had . . ., we'll never fully appreciate what actually
is happening.
