NON-DELIVERY of: Why so mean?

[Lotus -dot- M -dot- a -dot- i -dot- l -dot- Exchange -at- TESSPO-VA -dot- SMTRW -dot- LANGATE -dot- SPRINT -dot- COM]

--CQrDUGLB8vDXYB5m1OEqwiiltlBJKPUn
Content-type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"


                           Delivery Failure Report

                               Your document:
                                 Why so mean?
                         could not be delivered to:
                   Ronni Perry -at- CRWMS at DL-Notes -at- DL_CCMAIL
                                  because:
                   MailEx0010: cc:Mail user name too long.
                                Routing path:
                           DLLN2,DLLN2,DLLN2,DLLN2


                          ________________________




--CQrDUGLB8vDXYB5m1OEqwiiltlBJKPUn
Content-type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

RFC-822-Headers:
Comments: To: TECHWR-L -at- VM1 -dot- UCC -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU

--CQrDUGLB8vDXYB5m1OEqwiiltlBJKPUn
Content-type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

In response to Margie Foster's comment about the attitude and the
sarcasm appearing daily, I'm also concerned.  Where does this holier
than thou attitude come from?  There are no stupid questions.  The
stupidity lies in those who do not ask, but assume they know the
answer, and risk communicating erroneous information.

I question the capabilities of anyone who feels the need chide a fellow
communicator.  Sounds like big egos and not much else.  We are all
striving to enhance our positions among
programmers, etc., but putting others down to build ourselves up is
not the way to do it.  Grow up, people.

T.P. Rud

--CQrDUGLB8vDXYB5m1OEqwiiltlBJKPUn--