TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:NON-DELIVERY of: NON-DELIVERY of: Why so mean? From:Lotus -dot- M -dot- a -dot- i -dot- l -dot- Exchange -at- TESSPO-VA -dot- SMTRW -dot- LANGATE -dot- SPRINT -dot- COM Date:Fri, 23 Jun 1995 15:47:00 -0400
Your document:
NON-DELIVERY of: Why so mean?
could not be delivered to:
Ronni Perry -at- CRWMS at DL-Notes -at- DL_CCMAIL
because:
MailEx0010: cc:Mail user name too long.
Routing path:
DLLN2,DLLN2,DLLN2,DLLN2
Your document:
Why so mean?
could not be delivered to:
Ronni Perry -at- CRWMS at DL-Notes -at- DL_CCMAIL
because:
MailEx0010: cc:Mail user name too long.
Routing path:
DLLN2,DLLN2,DLLN2,DLLN2
In response to Margie Foster's comment about the attitude and the
sarcasm appearing daily, I'm also concerned. Where does this holier
than thou attitude come from? There are no stupid questions. The
stupidity lies in those who do not ask, but assume they know the
answer, and risk communicating erroneous information.
I question the capabilities of anyone who feels the need chide a fellow
communicator. Sounds like big egos and not much else. We are all
striving to enhance our positions among
programmers, etc., but putting others down to build ourselves up is
not the way to do it. Grow up, people.