Re: 50-ohm vs. # symbol

Subject: Re: 50-ohm vs. # symbol
From: Bonnie Nestor <mnj -at- ORNL -dot- GOV>
Date: Tue, 22 Aug 1995 09:25:04 -0400

In article <cmccaffrey-2108951719000001 -at- cmccaffr -dot- spyglass -dot- com>,
cmccaffrey -at- spyglass -dot- com (chuck mccaffrey) wrote:

> Is K a non-standard abbreviation for thousand or for 2**10=1024?

Both, probably. Lower-case "k" is the SI prefix for "thousand," hence "km"
for kilometers and "kg" for kilograms, but there are those Offenders
Against the Standards Embraced by All Right-Thinking People (please note
ironic capitals!) who use an upper-case "K" instead -- more than once,
I've seen kilowatt abbreviated "Kw" instead of the prescribed "kW."

I don't know what the computer folks have done/are doing with 2**10, but I
suspect the worst [:-)].

But wouldn't it be nice if salaries quoted as, say, $40K used the 2**10
multiplier?

Bonnie Nestor
mnj -at- ornl -dot- gov
DISCLAIMER: I work at Oak Ridge National Laboratory, for Lockheed Martin Energy
Systems, which is under contract to the U.S. Department of Energy -- but I
don't speak for any of them, and they return the favor.


Previous by Author: Re: 50-ohm vs. # symbol
Next by Author: Job Opening, Northern Illinois
Previous by Thread: Re: 50-ohm vs. # symbol
Next by Thread: Re: 50-ohm vs. # symbol


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads