TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
>I had ignored the flames and ravings about "the Findlay situation,"
>hoping that it would die off like many other frenzied outbursts. But
>after reading this post by mistake, I have to ask myself (and other
>subscribers) if this vitriolic and elitist reaction is something that
>we want to be associated with. Is this the kind of behavior
>that we accept as a reasonable reaction to a well-intention,
>innovative (if somewhat unwise) pedagogical strategy for introducing
>new technical writers into one aspect of their future careers? I
>personally find Robert's diatribe much more offensive than even the
>most ill-considered "student" post.
I was not reacting to either the students' postings, nor the instructor's
alleged intentions. I was reacting to the instructor's METHODS,
and his I-am-blameless-everything's-your-fault-you-awful-techwhirlers
posting.
The students are more or less in the clear, of course, since they were
acting on the unsound advice of an alleged expert.
Elitism? While I admit that I feel that some college instructors
are better than others, I hardly think that anything I said can be
construed as a blanket condemnation of ALL college instructors,
or a statement that technical writers occupy too lofty a place for
college instructors to aspire to. In fact, I don't think I
mentioned college instructors in the plural even once in my posting.
I was talking about a single, specific person. I neglected to
offer an opinion on any of the other 4,999,999,999 people on
the planet.
>As for going beyond rudeness straight to aggression, I believe Robert
>Plamondon is the one who bemoaned the fact that a poster had
>unsubscribed because he had missed his chance to
>"slap him around a little."
Indeed I did. This is, after all, a kinder, gentler age. One
can no longer use sword or pistol when claiming satisfaction for
untoward remarks. It's e-mails at dawn! Imagine my disgust
when the churl had fired off HIS round, then decamped before
a return shot could be readied. What's the world coming to?
>What a stunning lack of professionalism (and arrogance) from someone
>claiming such a superior grasp of etiquette and decorum.
Now, now. When did I make such a claim? I contrasted the conditions
of being "raised in civilized company," and "having half a clue" to
those of being "raised by wolves." I don't think these comparisons
have the sort precision or intricacy that cry out for the services
of a Trained Etiquette Professional (though one can always write Miss
Manners for a second opinion).
-- Robert
--
Robert Plamondon * High-Tech Technical Writing
36475 Norton Creek Road * Blodgett * Oregon * 97326
robert -at- plamondon -dot- com * (503) 453-5841
"I regret that I have but one * for my country." -- Nathan Hale