[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Author Index (this month)][Thread Index (this month)][Top of Archive]

2.1.1 and 2.1.2 without 2.2

Subject: 2.1.1 and 2.1.2 without 2.2
From: Richard Mateosian <srm -at- C2 -dot- ORG>
Date: Thu, 26 Oct 1995 13:38:54 -0700

>Would I have been able to put a 2.1 if I hadn't used a 2.2? If not,
>how do I do a 2.1.1 and a 2.1.2 if I hadn't used a 2.2

Common sense says that 2.2 has nothing to do with it.

However, anyone using a scheme like this must be doing so pursuant to a
specification, so read the spec for the answer. ...RM


Richard Mateosian http://www.c2.org/~srm/ President, Berkeley STC
Freelance Technical Writer srm -at- c2 -dot- org Review Editor, IEEE Micro

Previous by Author: Whirled class
Next by Author: Productivity
Previous by Thread: Caps in Titles
Next by Thread: Style Guide Questions

[Top of Archive] | [Author Index (this month)] | [Thread Index (this month)]

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads