TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: Pronouncing initialisms/acronyms (was: e-mail) From:"Dennis Hays/The Burden Lake Group, Ltd." <dlhays -at- IX -dot- NETCOM -dot- COM> Date:Mon, 15 Jan 1996 17:29:36 -0500
As a quick aside:
Years ago I, as a technical recruiter, I had to go to the UK on business.
Besides the many similarities/differences there was the different
pronounciation for the main frame "language" CICS.
In the US, the pronounciation was: See-Eye-See-Ess;
In the UK, the pronounciation was: Kicks.
So be it...
At 06:44 PM 01/14/1996 -0800:
>[I don't have an attribution for the three >> lines; sorry]
>Stuart Reynolds <reynolds -at- ic -dot- net> wrote:
>>>I pronounce URL as you-are-ell, because that seems the natural way to
>>>me. If I'd heard it spoken before I saw it in print I might pronounce
>>>it differently.
>>
>>Uhhhh.. it *is* You-Are-Ell... Uniform Resource Locator, or do people
>>use it, without knowing what the hell it stands for?
> [snip]
>> If you are in doubt, check with the originator
>>form CERN.. Tim Berners-Lee.. who created this addressing scheme, for
>>the World Wide Web, which he had conceived. Actually, I don't know if
>>he is still at CERN or not, but they could tell you.
>This brings up an interesting point: how do we (how does one?)
>decide on pronunciation of neologisms, particularly those used by
>folks who communicate through an unspoken medium such as the Net?
>Does the person who coined a word/an initialism get to determine
>its pronunciation? What if users of said term disagree with the
>creator?
>The question calls to mind a long thread I saw on the usenet group
>rec.arts.ascii about the pronunciation of GIF (hard G as in gift,
>or soft, as in "Choosy perverts choose GIFs!"?). Such arguments
>as originator's preference, general usage, and the sequence G-I in other
>English-language words (e.g., "giraffe") were put forth. I don't
>recall that any conclusion was reached.
>To bring this back to technical writing: if you are trying to
>decide on "a or an before an initialism" (a fascinating
>thread occurring on copyediting-l right now) and want to
>apply the rule "initial consonant sound gets a; initial vowel
>sound gets an" -- how do you decide on the initial sound of a
>new Net initialism that hasn't made its way into dictionaries
>yet? Is it "a you-are-ell" or "an earl"? And why (or why not)?
>To anyone out there who would use "an you-are-ell" -- how
>about FAQ: is it "an eff-ay-cue" or "a fack"?
>By golly, I probably need to post this to copyediting-l, too.
>Cathy Krusberg
>Internet: ckberg -at- ix -dot- netcom -dot- com
-------------> Dennis Hays, The Burden Lake Group, Ltd.
-------------> Voice: 518/477-6388 Fax: 518/477-5006
-------------> E-Mail: dlhays -at- ix -dot- netcom -dot- com
------------->"God doesn't want you to be certain.
That's why He gave you a brain."