TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: Is grammar fair game? From:Nancy Hayes <nancyh -at- PMAFIRE -dot- INEL -dot- GOV> Date:Tue, 13 Feb 1996 16:14:12 GMT
In article <9602121608 -dot- AA06341 -at- sd -dot- co -dot- il>, Mark Levinson <mark -at- sd -dot- co -dot- il> wrote:
>There are plenty of occasions when the grammatical implications
>of the technology we're writing about are too fresh to be
>properly reflected in our reference books. And the techwr-l
>community may understand better what we're talking about than
>the copyediting-l community would.
I'm really not flaming you, Mark, but I find this comment extremely
amusing (and just a touch condescending). The copyediting-l community is
extremely familiar with the problems of the "new" grammar necessary for
computer-related writing, online documentation, etc. Check out their
FAQ, if you doubt me. They've already had the discussion on whether the
end puctuation goes inside or outside, what's a decent alternative to the
"generic he", and even what to call the next decade. Even though the
group is "copyediting-l" most of the editors I've met are not just
copyeditors. Besides, do you really want to say something this
condescending to your fellow techwhirlers? I know I'm not the only
editor on this list that belongs to both groups.
Nancy Lynn Hayes (nancyh -at- pmafire -dot- inel -dot- gov) Carpe Diem
Seize the Day!
