TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: HTML Editors From:Susan Kloster <srk -at- PLAZA -dot- DS -dot- ADP -dot- COM> Date:Thu, 7 Mar 1996 09:55:19 -0800
>Why would you elect to put your ISO docs into HTML and view with Netscape,
>when a)that lets people save your doc locally, something you definitely
>don't want to do in an ISO environment, and b)limits your layout options?
>Why not go with Acrobat or something similar that can't be messed with and
>maintains formatting?
Well...where shall I start?
1) Relatively inexpensive
2) Negates the cross platform problems (software and hardware)
3) Eliminates the need for a database to track documents
4) Allows us to eliminate controlled distribution
5) Allows us to virtually dispense with controlled hardcopies all together
6) Through read/write file attributes, we control who can muck with the
procedures
7) Convenient
8) Attractive
9) Techies like it
10) Remote facilities can access shared procedures produced by a central
facility and vice versa
Layout? Who cares about layout? We are talking about engineers,
propellerheads, and technical support people writing documents. As long as
the required elements exist in a particular document...we don't care. KISS
is my motto.
