TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re[2]: FrameMaker Required From:Joyce Flaherty <flahertj -at- SMTPGW -dot- LIEBERT -dot- COM> Date:Sun, 17 Mar 1996 15:16:23 EST
On 3-14-96 Robert Plamondon wrote:
<snip>
>> My experience is that few people read manuals until
>> they are completely stuck. If they can muddle along,
>> they are content. Thus, one can become an instant
>> expert by plowing through the manual set. The payoff
>> is swift (in terms of productivity), and everyone
>> decides that you're a genius. Many departments gain
>> a total reliance on the one "genius" who read the
>> manuals or went to classes and thus gained an understanding
>> of the product. But high-end products like Interleaf
>> or FrameMaker cannot be used properly if there's only
>> one trained user in a department. That one user is
>> invaluable, but the whole operation is still grossly
>> inefficient.
<snip>
==========
Robert,
For the record, I have never *plowed through* a manual or manual set
in my life. I'm a voracious reader, but I read books that describe
processes conceptually. I know what tasks an application pkg should
perform. If the how-to is not obvious from the interface, then I go
to the book. This approach works for me. Furthermore and as a
result of this approach, I consider myself an expert on a handful
of tools. I do not muddle along, unless I am using a tool so
infrequently that learning it is just not worth the bother (for
example, some Norton utilities).
Conclusion: "All generalizations are false, including this one."
source--unknown.
joyce flaherty
flahertj -at- smtpgw -dot- liebert -dot- com