TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: CTS and Interleaf and rodents and... From:Laura Myott <lmyott -at- SVCDOC -dot- MC -dot- XEROX -dot- COM> Date:Tue, 2 Apr 1996 05:17:36 PST
On Tue, 2 Apr 1996, Jack Shaw said:
> It is my view that the menu-intensive orientation of Interleaf
> does, indeed, aggravate (if not downright cause) these problems.
> This, I base on the completely personal experience I have had
> that when I avoid conventional pointing device usage (mouse and
> trackball) and rely as much as possible on keyboard (so-called
> "shortcut") sequences such as Ctrl-x-i for italics, Ctrl-x-b for
> bold, etc., my hands are less sensitive at the end of a day. But
> Interleaf is *very* skimpy with keyboard shortcuts. What shortcuts
> it has (as you see above...) are convoluted and non-intuitive.
> Secondly, one of the most unfriendly setups for me was the optical
> mouse with the special mousepad that Sun workstations (the usual
> UNIX platform for Interleaf) use. I needed to make repetitive strafing
> runs with the mouse over the pad--and ONLY over the pad works--to get the
> cursor over long distances. True, there is an acceleration/speed
> macro control...but then the fine "brain surgery" operations like
> picking out an index tag (no keyboard shortcuts for this, like lots
> of other critically minute Interleaf actions...) to open its property
> sheet, are painstaking/ful.
> So all in all, I would put Interleaf V.5 in the most-suspect category
> for aggravating if not downright causing RSI problems for those of
> us that work with it long periods per day. But it's no secret that
> I've picked bones over Interleaf here before...so in fairness, I have
> to acknowledge Interleaf's recent claims to more "Windows-like" char-
> acteristics that they alledge for Version 6 (either true Windows for
> PC environnments or for UNIX). But I have no personal experience with
> either of their Version 6 platforms, so I'm only citing their hype.
I agree with Jack's statements regarding Interleaf and Sun workstations.
I can also attest to the fact that Interleaf 6 and 6.1 are no closer to
"Windows-like" platforms than Interleaf 5. We had 6 and recently upgraded
to 6.1, and I see no improvement in the "shortcut" keys compared to what
Jack describes. I also have a real problem with Sun's optical mouse. I've
never had wrist problems before, but over the last 3 weeks when I was working
about 50+ hours a week (deadline time) my mouse hand got quite sore, and that
had never happened with any amount of use with a regular mouse. I don't know
if the problem is with the optical mouse as much as it is with the less than
sensitive mouse buttons. However, Sun does have a new trackball (not sure of
the terminology) mouse that looks and works like any regular mouse; I'm
looking forward to latching onto one in the near future. Hopefully that will
help. I also hope that Interleaf does achieve a more "Windows-like" feel.
I was so used to Ctrl+C and Ctrl+V for copy and paste--Ctrl+Insert and
Shift+Insert just don't make sense in my book. So far, those few special
keys on the left-hand side of a Sun keyboard are my only saving grace.
Laura Myott
Technical Writer
lmyott -at- svcdoc -dot- mc -dot- xerox -dot- com