TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: Big monitors (very long) From:Kat Nagel/MasterWork <katnagel -at- EZNET -dot- NET> Date:Thu, 27 Jun 1996 19:00:07 -0400
Me:
>>by the fact that I was looking for a 21" hi-rez -grayscale- monitor.
RM
>I can see how that would be really neat for a lot of things, but don't you
>need color for a lot of things (I'm not sure what)?
What for? Most of my work is designed---at most---for 2 spot colors. I
just say "make all Chapter Titles and Level1 headings blue," or something.
I certainly don't need a color monitor or color printer for -that-.
Even my last project (a 45-slide full-color PowerPoint presentation) was
done with imported graphics. The -client- obviously needed a good color
system. The -artist- needed a color monitor to see all the possible
color variations when he did the design work. I previewed/approved all the
art work on his system. All -I- needed was (were? aargh!) 256 grays to
show me the pretty holes where I could put my text.
Even web browsing is less of a headache (and I mean that -quite-
literally) when I use my desktop grayscale set-up rather than my PowerBook
540c.
Note: I have been told that my visual system is a little weird. Where
most folks look at a color monitor and see black text on a white ground, I
see 3 distinct images---black, red and blue---like a TV screen with a
really bad 'ghost' problem. If I try to use even the top-of-the-line Sony,
Apple or NEC monitors for more than 90 minutes or so, I get a severe
headache and my eyes blur so badly I can't see my fingers on the keyboard.
It takes 15-20 minutes to recover enough to start working again. Lousy
productivity measurements, no?
>What kind did you buy, and do you have any advice on color monitors?
My old monitor was a SuperMac Platinum 21. If I could have replaced it
with an identical model, I would have. This time I wound up with a Radius
21" grayscale that is almost as good. The background has a slightly yellow
(rather than blue) cast to the gray, and the dot pitch is OK. I don't
recall what the 'official' resolution #s are, but I can use it for about 3
hours before my eyes blur out. And the size is perfect. It fits 2
complete pages on the screen, so I can do double-page layouts or compare
two docs.
There is only one model that I would have preferred. Nanao (sp? can't
find the brochure) makes a monitor for professional magazine photographic
editors that would have been perfect, but they were back-ordered for at
least a month. I just couldn't afford to wait.
Nanao also makes the best color monitor for my needs. It's the only 21"
color monitor---other than $10K+ film-editing special effects
workstations---that has a dot pitch of better than .26. (One Hitachi model
claims .22, but nobody I could find has ever actually gotten hold of a
unit. It's always 'temporarily unavailable').
This one is VERY crisp and clean. I can read ordinary 12-pt text all day
on it. The colors are clear, and easy to calibrate with on-screen
controls. And it was the only model where I could actually adjust the
color convergence to make -both- the red and blue shadows totally
disappear. The best I could do on other models was choose which variety of
blur I wanted.
My only reservation is reliability/repair. I couldn't find any stats on
it, and I don't know how long they've been distributing in the US, or what
the parts availability is like for typical repairs.
When I finally dive into web-page graphic design in a big way (rather than
just general layout, typography and content), I'll pick up one of the Nanao
models. Until then, I really can't justify the cost (about 3X grayscale
for equivalent resolution).
K@ __________________________________________________Kat Nagel
LIFE1: Technical writing/Document design/Publications planning
MasterWork Consulting Services katnagel -at- eznet -dot- net
Health info service mediref -at- mcls -dot- rochester -dot- lib -dot- ny -dot- us
LIFE2: Vocal chamber music PlaynSong -at- aol -dot- com
TECHWR-L List Information
To send a message about technical communication to 2500+ list readers,
E-mail to TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU -dot- Send administrative commands
ALL other questions or problems concerning the list
should go to the listowner, Eric Ray, at ejray -at- ionet -dot- net -dot-