TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: accuracy from reviewers? From:Kris Olberg <kjolberg -at- IX -dot- NETCOM -dot- COM> Date:Thu, 3 Oct 1996 08:40:23 -0700
At 05:04 PM 10/1/96 -0700, you wrote:
>Given the fact that reviewers generally have 101 other things they'd
>rather be doing than reviewing your document, how do people try to ensure
>accuracy from reviewers?
Do you hold "review meetings"? This is a good place to verbally highlight potential problem areas. Often, it fosters discussion between developers. But here's a side effect: sometimes it stimulates well-reasoned changes to the product ... )-:
Regards...Kris
--------------------------------
kjolberg -at- ix -dot- netcom -dot- com (preferred)
kjolberg -at- aol -dot- com
kolberg -at- actamed -dot- com
102031 -dot- 3556 -at- compuserve -dot- com
s -dot- othoudt -at- worldnet -dot- att -dot- net
