TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: Re[2]: Techie First or Writer? -Reply From:Joanna Sheldon <cjs10 -at- CORNELL -dot- EDU> Date:Fri, 11 Oct 1996 20:24:22 -0400
At 10:00 11/10/96 +0000, David wrote:
>Michael Sechelski said
>> <snip> The difference is that
>> engineers/programmers/etc are "producers"
>> whereas tech comm is an "add-on service"
>> that doesn't really produce anything, takes
>> up office space and burns electricity to
>> produce those d___ manuals that nobody uses
>> anyway. I think that's the perception in
>> the eyes of a lot of upper management.
>That is the perception and it will take a while longer to change that
>perception. STC is no help even after trying to figure out what a technical
>writer adds to a product or company, because the best they came up with, as
>far as I've been told, is that we are a cost or profit center. I disagree
>with both, but only in the context of software vendors. Pharmaceutical
>companies doing compliance, or other companies doing ISO will still classify
>us as cost or profit centers.
I find it's good policy to point out from time to time that the company has
*no* product if the customer does not understand how to use the
hardware/software. In other words: