TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: Passive Voice? in Scientific Writing From:"Wayne J. Douglass" <wayned -at- VERITY -dot- COM> Date:Thu, 7 Nov 1996 10:57:34 -0800
At 01:00 PM 11/7/96 -0500, you wrote:
>Hi all! (Forgive the cross-postings.) I deal with mostly scientists here
>at NASA who almost always write in passive voice. As much as possible, I
>change it ("it has been noted" gets changed to "it was noted", etc.).
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Alas, the marked phrase is still passive voice with fewer words (and only
one at that). The way to change it to active voice is to say who noted it:
"Joe Schmoe noted in the Journal of Irreproducible Results that..."
--Wayne Douglass
===================================================
Verity, Inc. Email: wayned -at- verity -dot- com
894 Ross Drive Telephone: 408-542-2139
Sunnyvale, CA 94089 Facsimile: 408-542-2040
===================================================
