TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: Punctuation From:Don Smith <dsmith -at- ACCESSBEYOND -dot- COM> Date:Tue, 3 Dec 1996 08:34:28 EST
Bill -
I appreciate your editorial corrections to my Email.
However, though I am sure you have many reasons why the comma should
be inside the quotes, I tell you why it never will in my writing. The
item I am "quoting" is flamed and I am the comma is not part of that
quote. The comma refers to the clause and for that reason follows the
close quote.
I suppose this is the same reasoning used in defending including the
sentence period in a quote (or parenthesis) if it is around the last
word. Never, never, never. Maybe this kind of thinking is why I am a
Senior Writer and not a Publications Manager these days.
By the way, are you available to edit all of my Email at no charge?
Don
______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: Punctuation
Author: Bill -dot- Warner -at- RELIASTAR -dot- COM at INTERNET
Date: 12/2/96 5:41 PM
Don wrote:
>At the risk of getting "flammed", isn't our own integrity involved
>here? I would not consider telling other than the truth on my
>Resume'. Color a little, perhaps, but list things not true, not a
>chance.
I suggest that your punctuation should be: "flammed,"
resume. (...Resume'. sic: lower case "r"; no [']