TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: Worth of Benefits From:Michael Andrew Uhl <uhl -at- VISLAB -dot- EPA -dot- GOV> Date:Tue, 18 Feb 1997 12:58:08 -0800
Daniel Wise is fortunate to have made it to the buyout and
pension payout stage in life. Melissa is in a tough bind: things
are OK as long as she has her job; and I dearly hope she
keeps it. I'm keeping my job for as long as I can, because I
love the benefits, modest as they are.
My message to the younger colleagues among us is, don't
*automatically* assume your benefits are worth more than what
you could earn at a higher salary and *less* in the way of
benefits.
Here's another angle, which certainly doesn't apply to
somone like Melissa, who has tremendous responsibility for
others. One reason people stay on a job they dislike or
suffer in, is because they hope if they tough it out for
just a few more years--to get fully vested--or another
ten or fifteen years to retire, the pain will all be worth it.
They forget that they're loving employer, 'we're a family here,'
will downsize them out the door in a heartbeat if they think
they can make more money or look better to the stockholders
in doing so. Heavy dependency on an employer is a scary thing,
a thing I would not wish upon anyone. For those who can, I
recommend maintaining contingency plans. Be aware of what you
can do apart from your employer. Prepare.
For those of us with benefits, we should never take them for
granted. I know many of our coleagues who'd dearly love to have
them.
I hope to see some of you in Toronto.
Cheers.
-Mike
--
Michael Andrew Uhl (919) 541-4283
Lead Technical Writer, Lockheed Martin
U.S. EPA Scientific Visualization Center &
National Environmental Supercomputing Center
Research Triangle Park, North Carolina USA
Melissa
Melissa Hunter-Kilmer wrote:
>
> On Sun, 16 Feb 1997, Daniel Wise <dewise -at- IX -dot- NETCOM -dot- COM> wrote:
>
> > In the digest for Feb. 13-14, Mike Uhl tells us to "do the atrithmetic." He
> > asks "How much are those benefits worth?"
> >
> > Mike, in my case they were worth 48% of my annual base salary, which was in
> > the middle five-figures. That is a considerable sum. Now that I have
> > accepted an early retirement package from my employer, they are still worth
> > over $400 a month just in medical insurance. And I am also collecting that
> > pension I worked 21 years to get.
>
> I have also done the math and found it unpersuasive in my case. Every year, my
> delightful company (which can read my mail any time it wants, because our e-mail
> is considered corporate property) gives me three paid personal days, ten paid
> holidays, thirteen paid sick days, four weeks of paid vacation. (In two years,
> I will get five weeks of vacation.) It also pays my health and dental insurance
> (as well as for my dependents, though that may change after the current round of
> contract bargaining) and most of the life insurance premiums on a policy that
> would pay twice my yearly salary to my beneficiary.
>
> Okay, that's pretty good, but what *really* convinces me is that I have four
> minor children and a dependent husband. Said husband suffers from severe
> depression and cannot work outside the home, at least at this time. I have
> asthma. Both of us need lots of medication to keep us relatively healthy. My
> company has a prescription plan so that we never pay more than $10 per
> prescription, and we can get a 90-day supply at a time. Folks, medicine for
> depression and asthma can be expensive, but not for us.
>
> Moreover, I'm enrolled in a 401(k) that buys only stock in our company, which is
> owned by the employees. This stock has never gone down in value, almost always
> pays a dividend, is not at all volatile, and is averaging a 13% return in the
> last few years if you re-invest the dividends.
>
> I've been here for 12 years, and I'd like to stay for at least another 16
> years, when I should be able to retire. (Yes, we get a pension, too.)
> Contracting just wouldn't pay for me, at least until my kids are grown and my
> husband has recovered. It works out beautifully for my co-worker, who is
> single and fairly healthy.
>
> It all jives with some of my basic Rules for Living:
>
> 1. Figure out what works _for you._
>
> 2. Do it.
>
> 3. Repeat forever.
>
> Melissa Hunter-Kilmer
> mhunterk -at- bna -dot- com
> (standard disclaimer)
>
> TECHWR-L (Technical Communication) List Information: To send a message
> to 2500+ readers, e-mail to TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU -dot- Send commands
> to LISTSERV -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU (e.g. HELP or SIGNOFF TECHWR-L).
> Search the archives at http://www.documentation.com/ or search and
> browse the archives at http://listserv.okstate.edu/archives/techwr-l.html
TECHWR-L (Technical Communication) List Information: To send a message
to 2500+ readers, e-mail to TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU -dot- Send commands
to LISTSERV -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU (e.g. HELP or SIGNOFF TECHWR-L).
Search the archives at http://www.documentation.com/ or search and
browse the archives at http://listserv.okstate.edu/archives/techwr-l.html