TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: Hot Topics From:Tim Altom <taltom -at- IQUEST -dot- NET> Date:Sun, 9 Mar 1997 09:12:41 -0600
At 08:25 PM 3/8/97 PST, you wrote:
>
>I don't know about video, but certainly illustration is under-used
>in most manuals. Every writer should take a technical illustration
>course, even if you have illustrators at your beck and call, so you
>understand the field well enough to integrate illustrations into
>your document design.
>
>I usually take a "pictures first, then words" approach to documents.
>
> -- Robert
>--
Me too. I once startled an illustrator by baldly telling her that her
"pitchers" would be of far more importance than my words could be. In fact,
I'm one of the few people I know who studies the little cards that airlines
put in the pockets of seats telling you where the exits are. I don't
memorize exit routes, I admit, but I'm fascinated by how well the card can
do its job without words. Some work for me, some don't. I'll often sit
looking at one for minutes at a time, trying to see what's effective and
what isn't. Then people sitting next to me start looking at theirs, too,
thinking that maybe I got a psychic reading before takeoff or something.
Here's a conundrum...I once read a hypothetical (I THINK it was a
hypothetical) situation in which a manual was reduced literally to nothing
more than a comic book without even thought balloons to interrupt the
graphical approach. Then, when a user was hurt by not following the
instructions closely, he/she sued on the basis that any instructions that
look like a comic book can't reasonably expect to be taken seriously, hence
is containing its own seeds for being ignored. In other words, the more
infantile we make our instructions, the more a user should be expected to
look at those instructions as Capain Marvel tripe and ignore them. Taken to
an extreme, a manual done in High Latin in an illuminated manuscript would
unconditionally shield the manufacturer from liability of having his manual
ignored. So, presumably, would a manual laid out to look like a 1040-A.
Tim Altom
Vice President, Simply Written, Inc.
317.899.5882 (voice) 317.899.5987 (fax)
FrameMaker support ForeHelp support
FrameMaker-to-HTML Conversions
HTML Help Consulting and Production
TECHWR-L (Technical Communication) List Information: To send a message
to 2500+ readers, e-mail to TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU -dot- Send commands
to LISTSERV -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU (e.g. HELP or SIGNOFF TECHWR-L).
Search the archives at http://www.documentation.com/ or search and
browse the archives at http://listserv.okstate.edu/archives/techwr-l.html