TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
I haven't been following this thread, so my apologies to the list if
these terms have already been submitted: third-party and out-source.
Regards,
Don Timmerman, dtimmerman -at- anl -dot- gov
______________________________ Forward Header __________________________________
Subject: Turn-key supplier instead of OEM
Author: "E,T, Hull" <ethull -at- WORLDACCESS -dot- NL> at IPDLINK
Date: 5/29/97 2:38 AM
Hello to all,
Thanks to all of you who responded to my "co-maker which became OEM"
problem. I agree that OEM does not fit the situation. How about "turn-key
supplier"?
TECHWR-L (Technical Communication) List Information: To send a message
to 2500+ readers, e-mail to TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU -dot- Send commands
to LISTSERV -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU (e.g. HELP or SIGNOFF TECHWR-L).
Search the archives at http://www.documentation.com/ or search and
browse the archives at http://listserv.okstate.edu/archives/techwr-l.html