Re: "white papers"

Subject: Re: "white papers"
From: "Huber, Mike" <mrhuber -at- SOFTWARE -dot- ROCKWELL -dot- COM>
Date: Tue, 3 Jun 1997 15:24:43 -0500

My guess is that it distinguishes it from the more obvious commercial marketing pieces that are printed in lots of colors.

Mike Huber
mike -dot- huber -at- software -dot- rockwell -dot- com

-----Original Message-----
From: Paula Foster [SMTP:foster -dot- 242 -at- OSU -dot- EDU]
Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 1997 3:07 PM
To: TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU
Subject: "white papers"

So maybe the expression "white paper" got started as a temporal order thing,
but got fixed at some point, in some industries, to designate a particular
genre of document?

I dunno. FWIW!

TECHWR-L (Technical Communication) List Information: To send a message
to 2500+ readers, e-mail to TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU -dot- Send commands
to LISTSERV -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU (e.g. HELP or SIGNOFF TECHWR-L).
Search the archives at http://www.documentation.com/ or search and
browse the archives at http://listserv.okstate.edu/archives/techwr-l.html


Previous by Author: Business Card RE: Technical Writer Title
Next by Author: Re: Summary: Using Word's Hidden Text as a conditional....
Previous by Thread: "white papers"
Next by Thread: Re: "white papers"


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads