TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
I'm coming out of lurk mode to ask a question. I've searched the
archives and haven't found an answer, so I thought I'd pose the question
to you.
While editing a document that our states our company's year 2000 policy,
I began to wonder about whether I ought to i-cap and/or hyphenate "year
2000."
Which (if any of these) do you think is correct:
1) year 2000 compliant
2) year-2000 compliant
3) year 2000-compliant
4) year-2000-compliant
5) Year 2000 compliant, etc.
How would you punctuate/capitalize this phrase: "a year 2000 compliant
release"?
I've checked around online and seen it used only without hypens;
sometimes "year" is i-capped and sometimes not. I've even seen it
written as "Year2000".
Is there a standard?
I'd appreciate your advice on this. If you want to send mail to me
personally, I can summarize to the list if anyone else is interested.
Thanks (in advance) for your help!
Rebecca Siegel
Logic Associates
rebecca -at- zlogic -dot- com
TECHWR-L (Technical Communication) List Information: To send a message
to 2500+ readers, e-mail to TECHWR-L -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU -dot- Send commands
to LISTSERV -at- LISTSERV -dot- OKSTATE -dot- EDU (e.g. HELP or SIGNOFF TECHWR-L).
Search the archives at http://www.documentation.com/ or search and
browse the archives at http://listserv.okstate.edu/archives/techwr-l.html